Google Scholar – an unlimited database of state and federal case legislation, which is searchable by keyword, phrase, or citations. Google Scholar also allows searchers to specify which level of court cases to search, from federal, to specific states.

The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The lots of this power casts an obligation over the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested to get a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. Read more

As the Supreme Court is definitely the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has actually been attained, therefore the decision of the Supreme Court needs to become taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) on the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more

We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy on the information contained on this site, or the information linked to about the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can create inaccuracies. You should read the full case before depending on it for legal research purposes.

This Court could interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer within a way inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the method of inquiry or where the summary or finding attained via the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. In case the conclusion or finding is like no reasonable person would have ever reached, the Court may possibly interfere with the conclusion or the finding and mould the relief to make it acceptable to your facts of each and every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-value the evidence or the nature of punishment. On the aforesaid proposition, we are fortified through the decision from the Supreme Court within the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Read more

Most of the volumes (like more recent volumes than the library's holdings) also are available online through the Caselaw Access Project.

Law professors traditionally have played a much scaled-down role in building case law in common regulation than professors in civil law. Because court decisions in civil regulation traditions are historically brief[four] rather than formally amenable to establishing precedent, much from the exposition on the legislation in civil regulation traditions is completed by academics rather than by judges; this is called doctrine and may be published in treatises or in journals which include Recueil Dalloz in France. Historically, common legislation courts relied little on legal scholarship; Consequently, in the turn from the twentieth century, it absolutely was really scarce to find out an educational writer quoted within a legal decision (apart from Maybe for that academic writings of well known judges such as Coke and Blackstone).

168 . H.C.A 203/2016 (D.B.) Saleh Muhammad V/S Faqir Muhammad & others Sindh High Court, Karachi Matter: Appeal At times it is easy for any Judge to dismiss the suit for non-prosecution, however, a Judge is under the obligation to make an attempt to get rid of a case on benefit and more importantly when after recording of evidence it's reached to some stage of final arguments, endeavors should be made for advantage disposal when it has reached this sort of stage. Read more

Only the written opinions from the Supreme Court along with the Court of Appeals are routinely accessible. Decisions with the reduced (trial) courts are not generally published or distributed.

Article 199 in the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other satisfactory remedy is provided by law." It can be well-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust obtainable remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether those remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more

Executing a case regulation search may be as easy as getting into specific keywords or citation into a search engine. There are, however, certain websites that facilitate case legislation searches, which include:

A year later, Frank and Adel have a similar difficulty. When they sue their landlord, the court must use the previous court’s decision in making use of the regulation. This example of case legislation refers to two cases listened to during the state court, with the same level.

Where there are several members of a court deciding a ubi jus ibi remedium case law case, there could be just one or more judgments supplied (or reported). Only the reason for that decision with the majority can constitute a binding precedent, but all could possibly be cited as persuasive, or their reasoning might be adopted in an argument.

Rulings by courts of “lateral jurisdiction” are usually not binding, but could possibly be used as persuasive authority, which is to give substance towards the party’s argument, or to guide the present court.